Let's say he's been acting this way for awhile, totally weirding out his neighbors and any women he talks to, and he's...that type. Dominant, overbearing, seemingly well-educated but prone to being taken in by fake news articles, conspiracy theories and half-truths. He himself "alt right" but you know it's straight-up racism.
Let's say this guy - we'll call him Chad - is at a crowded bar and Tina gets stuck standing next to him. He's being a total douche to Tina but she can't just get away from him. He's creeping on her, saying if she won't go out with him he'll "just rape her oh haha but anyway what're you going to do about it". He also jokes that he "owns" her and she'll "never get away from him". Even if they were together that'd be creepy as hell, but they're not!
Tina's a good friend of yours, very loyal.
You'd go in there and be like "hey, Chad, leave Tina the fuck alone. And that rape joke is seriously not funny. If you don't walk that back I'm calling the cops because that's a real threat and it's not okay."
...right?
You definitely wouldn't be all "well, you know, Chad's going through a rough time right now. And I totally still owe him some money. So I probably shouldn't get involved. Tina can handle herself" (Tina keeps throwing glances at you, begging for help).
No way would you say "I mean Chad was just joking about raping her, right? He wouldn't actually do that! I'm sure Tina and Chad can work it out themselves!"
"When he says he 'owns' her, it just means he really likes her, he doesn't mean it like MEAN it mean it," you definitely would not state.
"It's not like Chad's raping her NOW. She's fine. Ew, he's totally pressing his hard-on into her thigh...that must really suck for Tina, but it's not my business. I have to trust Tina to deal with him herself. Maybe she should just talk to him about it and get him to understand that's not okay?"
Chad's raging boner |
Certainly, you'd never say that.
"I mean, Chad totally buys her lots of drinks and she's drinking them. Well, okay, he's pressuring her to, but still. She could probably just say no even though she's really scared. I mean she looks genuinely scared! One of them probably has roofies in it, but she hasn't passed out yet. She can take care of herself."
You'd think you were being a horrible person if you said that, right?
"I mean, the last time we thought we could help out Irene and get her crazy ex-husband off her back, and look what happened, we totally fucked it up and ruined her life. So we definitely shouldn't tell Chad to knock if off."
Nope, not from you. You have integrity!
"The thing about Chad is, he totally thinks he's better than anyone else. He'll even tell you it's a race thing or a guy thing. Yeah, he's kinda racist but what're ya gonna do? He says we have to respect his views. I totally think that's bullshit, but I'm a tolerant person so I can't say he's a terrible person just for having a different opinion. Of course I don't agree, I care about women and other people no matter where they are from. I think everyone should be equal and the world would be better if we could all just get along. I would never say what he says, though, because I'm woke!"
You'd be all "whoever said something like that was a total douchebag", right? After all, you're one of the good ones!
"Also, about Chad? I really can't just step in because he might actually start a fight. I like Tina a lot, I really respect what a strong, beautiful woman she is. Everybody calls her Beautiful Tina! I can't say that too much or talk to her too much, or Chad gets mad at me."
"The thing is, I don't want to get into a fight with Chad so there's nothing I can do. Even though if he could beat me up he could totally wreck Tina. He could really beat me up! The last time we kind of knocked his fedora a little askance he totally complained about it for ages."
"If I stepped in it could be worse for Tina! He might get mad and go after her for real and that might really be a problem!"
"I know it's totally weird that Chad tells everyone they're dating already when they clearly aren't, but maybe she should just go with it? People already believe Chad anyway. Like, is that worse than getting raped?"
Tina: "For fuck's sake, is anybody going to help me get Chad off my back? I could really use some help here."
I hope you see where I'm going with this.
Chad and Tina |
Quite literally, y'all have been letting a shitty privileged dude get away with harassing everyone else and done nothing about it despite claiming to feel otherwise. Nobody cares about how you feel - we care about what you do.
I am a big fan of liberalism. I'm not as far left as a lot of my friends, but then a fair number are straight-up Communists (I'm not), but you can consistently count on me to fight for equal rights, fair pay, a strong social safety net and legal weed.
But I just can't get over the knock-kneed wuss-ass liberal approach to Taiwan. You - all of you - are quite literally watching your friend sit there and take credible threats and doing nothing about it, like that not-really-a-friend bullshit "but I'm not like that, I respect _____!" loser at the bar who won't stand up when it counts. The sort of person I wouldn't trust as a friend, because they would have so many pretty words but not have my back.
You are not a true liberal unless you actually stand up for what you believe in. That means standing up for the folks you claim to care about so much. In this case, standing up for Taiwan. If you want to continue to sell out liberal, democratic Taiwan in order to make nice with dictatorial China, but otherwise call yourself a liberal, you are a hypocrite.
I'm sick of the OMG PHONE CALL too, and I still don't want Trump to be the one to have made it. I still wish it could have been a competent leader under a coherent, ethical policy shift. The craptacular "oh but but but, oh but...we can't anger CHAD! We have to be careful with CHAD!" from not only most major media outlets - not only including but especially the ones with a liberal slant - but also the more liberal end of the diplomatic community has, shall we say, been less than inspiring. I'm starting to feel like, as much as I hate it, and as much as I do not and will not ever absolve Trump, and cannot and will never trust him, the people I wanted to make that call never would have.
This does not mean it's okay that a guy who can't be trusted to stand by Taiwan when it counts was the one to do this, it just exposes the hypocrisy of all the people who could have done so credibly, but didn't.
They'd have let Tina sit there stuck at the bar with Chad's trouser tent bruising her thigh, joking about raping her, and done fuck all about it because "oh no China might get mad oh no".
"This is not how things are done" and "this is a delicate matter!" are increasingly starting to sound like so much window dressing for "oh but there's nothing we can do, you know how Chad can be!" I'd be more inclined to believe it if I still believed they'd eventually do something about Chad. It is becoming quite clear they never intended to.
Obama, as much as I have otherwise supported him despite his sometimes weak leadership and occasional hypocrisies, would have never made that call, as much as I wanted him to. Clinton wouldn't likely have either. And their liberal media friends would have continued making hypocritical excuses for why not, and still insisted they really did care, but, you know, it's a tough situation.
So, I love you liberals. I really do. I am one of you. So I say this with love in my heart:
Shut the fuck up with your excuses. You are embarrassing yourselves. Stand up for what you believe in.
Love you babe. What a great analogy! No one wants to get involved with rightists backing Trump on this, no one wants to tangle with lazy leftists who still think women hold up half the sky in China.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile President Tsai keeps keeping on, coming back for more abuse, every day... And the male expats keep talking about her tactical errors and never mentioning gender.
Fuck them! Bars and politics are male turf, so any woman there is asking for it? It's time we walk our talk for Taiwan: get out there and say we're here, we're (politically) queer, and we're not going away.
It's a lovely analogy...unless it turns out that the person who's intervening with Chad is simply trying to gin up a conflict with Chad for some other purpose and doesn't give a rat's ass about Tina.
ReplyDeleteLater, when Chad eventually negotiates some outcome (completely unrelated to Tina) that pleases the intervener, one wonders what Ms. Cody will have to say when the result is something like, "I stood up for Tina. See what a great and moral intervener I am? You're welcome. And Chad...well, he's promised me that he's going to be very good - terrific, believe me - so I've negotiated a great deal where he'll drive Tina home."
It's a fair point, though keep in mind I have said all along I don't want Trump to be the one doing this. Trump is not the right person to deal with Chad, in fact, Trump'd probably harass Tina himself (both literally and metaphorically). I hate Trump with a burning, deep, merciless passion. I trust him not at all. That will never change.
ReplyDeleteTrump is not a good guy - I am specifically calling out the professional diplomats and leaders, the folks who think of themselves as good guys, especially on the liberal side. THEY are the ones who should have told Chad to buzz off all along.
The people I am calling out for not standing up to Chad are the ones who, administration after administration, have not done so despite being more trustworthy actors (in that at least one can believe they have a follow-through plan and have envisioned the consequences). Trump? Fuck 'im.